Skip to main content

The Nose Knows


Ever gotten a whiff of a tainted bottle of wine? You pop the cork and instead of ripe berry notes and velvety toasted oak, a waft of damp mustiness greets your nostrils. Scientists have known that TCA, or 2,4,6-trichloroanisole, is the pesky chemical responsible for spoiled wine but new research has just uncovered what you actually smell—or don’t smell—from a tainted bottle.

It has been widely assumed that TCA interacts with your nose in the same way most other odorants do. Tiny smelly molecules usually bind to receptors in your mucous membrane and excite your olfactory nerve cells which tell your brain what you smell. However in a recent publication from Osaka University in Japan, scientists say that in fact TCA is not exciting your olfactory neurons at all. Instead TCA gets inside of your nosey nerve cells and prevents other odorants, like the ones that make your wine smell fruity and delicious, from being detected.

One clue to the authors’ conclusions is the exceedingly low concentration of TCA required to stop olfactory signals. Experimental evidence showed that even solutions of TCA with 600 molecules per milliliter could halt the sensory pathway—much fewer than would be required to physically block all of your smell receptors. If TCA were in fact binding to your smell receptors and telling your brain “oh that smells musty,” it would take way more than 600 molecules because (a) only a fraction of the molecules that enter your nose actually bind to a receptor at all and (b) a huge majority of receptors would need to be blocked to prevent detection of other smell-inducing molecules. But why do we care what TCA does in our noses?

It turns out odor masking agents like TCA are already used in perfumes to help cover up the unpleasant chemical smells of all those, well, chemicals. Many products that are advertised as “unscented” actually just contain a chemical like TCA that masks the other smells. I can also imagine several situations where a chemical that masks odors could be useful, like around my garbage can or in a port-o-potty. Now that we have a few clues about how TCA works maybe it will be applied to these smelly situations.

That being said, I personally think cork taint is a more pertinent problem than stinky trash cans. Think of all the wine that is going to waste! It has been shown that fungi that naturally reside on cork are at least partially responsible for producing TCA but they aren’t making TCA just to watch us wrinkle our noses. They are making it as a defense mechanism. TCA is largely non-toxic both to us and to fungi, but the molecule that it is made from, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, definitely is not. A fungus that is living with toxic 2,4,6-trichlorophenol nearby will work really hard to convert it to non-toxic TCA. And while it may be easy to say, “just kill the stupid fungi!” that might leave us with a bigger problem than off-smelling wine. 

Perhaps there is some way to break down the TCA into less potent molecules, or a way to strip the cork of TCA precursors before it’s used to plug a bottle of wine. In the meantime producers and consumers will both still curse TCA-ridden wine, but at least next time you pop a tainted bottle you’ll know more than your nose knows. 


Sources and further reading

Maria Luisa Alvarez-Rodriguez, et al. (2002) Cork Taint of Wines: Role of the Filamentous Fungi Isolated from Cork in the Formation of 2,4,6-Trichloroanisole by O Methylation of 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68 (12) p. 5860-5869.

Hiroko Takeuchi, Hiroyuki Kato, and Takashi Kurahashi. (2013) 2,4,6-Trichloroanisole is a potent suppressor of olfactory signal transduction. PNAS, published ahead of print September 16, 2013, doi:10.1073/pnas.1300764110.

L. Maggi, V. Mazzoleni,  M.D. Fumi and M.R. Salinas (2008) Transformation ability of fungi isolated from cork and grape to produce 2,4,6-trichloroanisole from 2,4,6-trichlorophenol. Food Additives and Contaminants: Part A (25)3, p. 265-269.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

AlphaFold2 Part 2: The ion channel challenge

Last month I wrote about the wonders and perils of the artificial intelligence program that predicts 3D protein structures, AlphaFold2. As an ion channel enthusiast , I naturally wanted to know how AlphaFold2 performs at predicting the structures of proteins embedded in cell membranes. When I search PubMed for articles that mention both "AlphaFold" and "ion channel" I only get 34 hits. This surprised me, given the hype and the general paranoia around AI replacing humanity. If we use these search results as a proxy for the state of the ion channel protein structure prediction field, I'd say the juice is still in the coconut. I wanted to know how well AF2 would do at predicting an ion channel protein structure, so I asked it to generate the structure of Kv2.1, a voltage-gated potassium ion channel that I studied during graduate school. Kv2.1 is a pretty important protein. It regulates neuron firing throughout the brain and body where it helps us learn new stuff, ...

iPSCs, the new model organism?

Induced pluripotent stem cells. The name doesn't exactly roll off the tongue and it certainly doesn't conjure images of mice, fruit flies, monkeys, or any of the other classic model organisms used for basic biomedical research. These so called "model organisms" are just that; animals that help scientists model the way that the most promising human therapeutics in the collective pipeline will behave in humans. And now induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPSCs, are becoming an increasingly popular tool used for developing and testing novel drugs way before we expose any real human patients to them. The upside to using model organisms is pretty obvious -- we minimize exposure of humans to potentially unsafe molecules. The downsides are many, but one big one is that sometimes potential new drug molecules look really promising when they are given to a mouse with a human-like disease, but then that same molecule does nothing (or worse, is toxic!) when it goes into human clin...

My take on AlphaFold2

I haven't spent too much time thinking about AlphaFold2 (AF2) since it entered the structural biology zeitgeist, but I was watching Veritasium's recent video on the topic and thought I would learn a bit more about it. For those who haven't heard of AlphaFold2, I highly recommend watching the video linked above, which explains AF2 better than I ever could. But the tl;dr version is this: AlphaFold2 is an artificial intelligence that takes any amino acid sequence (the building blocks of all proteins) as its input, and outputs the 3D protein structure it thinks that sequence is most likely to take. For some sequences, AlphaFold2 can do quite well at this notoriously complex task. On its debut in 2021, it was able to predict the 3D position of atoms in some protein backbones to within a few hundred nanometers! There are a plethora of articles out there speculating about how AF2 is going to change biology and the world at large. But someone recently asked me my opinion: "...