Skip to main content

Ready for a little mosquito bite?



That’s what my pediatrician used to say when he was about to give me a shot. Although shots were much scarier when I was 6, I wouldn’t exactly say I’ve grown into them. That’s why when flu season comes around I’m not the first in line to get vaccinated. I’ve gotten plenty of flu shots in my life, but in recent years I have not taken the vaccine as seriously as some perhaps do. However, considering the way vaccines work I should probably rethink my logic.

Before we can think about vaccines though, we should probably think about viruses themselves. A virus is sort of pitiful because it can’t multiply on its own. Unlike our cells which can grow and divide happily, the virus needs a host cell to help it multiply. Instead of asking politely, the virus sneaks some of its genetic material into our healthy cells and our cells unknowingly regenerate this genetic material into more viruses!  Luckily, this is when our immune system kicks in.

Our immune system is a slurry of specialized cells whose main job is to search and destroy foreign entities like viruses. However, these specialized cells need some way of figuring out which entities are viruses and which are healthy cells. Imagine you are blindfolded and told that one of your good friends is about to greet you. You can’t see them so you must depend on other clues, like the way their hand feels when you shake it or how tall they are when you hug them. This is sort of how your immune system recognizes the viruses it is working so hard to destroy.

Just like your friend has a distinctive shape, viruses have molecules protruding from their bodies that have distinctive shapes. Our immune cells “shake hands” with all the entities they come into contact with and distinguish the viruses from healthy cells by the shape of those protruding molecular hands. But if our bodies are so good at detecting and destroying viruses why do we use vaccines?

Vaccines give our bodies a leg up in the search and destroy part of the immune response. The first time a virus enters our body it will take a while for our immune cells to recognize the threat because they have never encountered the virus’ molecular shape before. However, our immune systems are good at remembering what molecular shapes they have encountered in the past, and when they meet again the virus doesn’t stand a chance.

You’ve probably heard that vaccines contain a little bit of virus in them, which sounds terrifying! The doctors are injecting you with the flu! This is true to an extent, but the shot only contains bits and pieces of the virus. Crucially, it only contains the bits and pieces that allow your immune system to meet the virus and “shake hands” with it without any real danger of a full blown infection. This way if some of the active virus does get into your body from your friend’s sneeze or your neighbor’s cough, your immune system will recognize it immediately and kill it before it kills you.

There is a lot more to learn about viruses and vaccines. Why do we need a new flu vaccine every year if we only need one measles vaccine in our lifetime? What are the virus’ “molecular hands” actually made of? Answer to those questions and more can be found in the sources and further reading, and all over the internet!

Sources and further reading
“Influenza, an ever-evolving target for vaccine development." Understanding Evolution. University of California Museum of Paleontology. 1 October 2013. http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/news/130201_flu

Saranya Sridhar, et al. (2013) Cellular immune correlates of protection against symptomatic pandemic influenza. Nature Medicine, published ahead of print 22 Sept 2013.

Zambon, M.C. (2001) The Pathogenesis of influenza in humans. Rev. Med. Virol. (4) pp 227-241.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AlphaFold2 Part 2: The ion channel challenge

Last month I wrote about the wonders and perils of the artificial intelligence program that predicts 3D protein structures, AlphaFold2. As an ion channel enthusiast , I naturally wanted to know how AlphaFold2 performs at predicting the structures of proteins embedded in cell membranes. When I search PubMed for articles that mention both "AlphaFold" and "ion channel" I only get 34 hits. This surprised me, given the hype and the general paranoia around AI replacing humanity. If we use these search results as a proxy for the state of the ion channel protein structure prediction field, I'd say the juice is still in the coconut. I wanted to know how well AF2 would do at predicting an ion channel protein structure, so I asked it to generate the structure of Kv2.1, a voltage-gated potassium ion channel that I studied during graduate school. Kv2.1 is a pretty important protein. It regulates neuron firing throughout the brain and body where it helps us learn new stuff, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Precision murder -- wait, no -- medicine

A non-zero amount of what we call ‘medicine’ could be described as just controlled cell murder.  This was my revelation after researching a new treatment for certain cardiac arrhythmias called Pulsed Electric Field Ablation, which I became interested in when my father-in-law asked me how it worked during our Christmas visit. “How can it kill the heart cells and leave the nerves and blood vessels intact?” I had no idea. I know next-to-nothing about medical treatments for cardiac patients, much less how this Pulsed Field Ablation technique could have fewer side effects than the standard-of-care ablation techniques. A quick Google search piqued my curiosity when I learned that PFA is also sometimes called “high frequency irreversible electroporation”. While less catchy, that name revealed a bit more about the mechanism of action behind PFA - electroporation - which happens to be something I actually do know something about. Electroporation refers to the formation of holes (pores) in c...
Post a Comment
Read more

iPSCs, the new model organism?

Induced pluripotent stem cells. The name doesn't exactly roll off the tongue and it certainly doesn't conjure images of mice, fruit flies, monkeys, or any of the other classic model organisms used for basic biomedical research. These so called "model organisms" are just that; animals that help scientists model the way that the most promising human therapeutics in the collective pipeline will behave in humans. And now induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPSCs, are becoming an increasingly popular tool used for developing and testing novel drugs way before we expose any real human patients to them. The upside to using model organisms is pretty obvious -- we minimize exposure of humans to potentially unsafe molecules. The downsides are many, but one big one is that sometimes potential new drug molecules look really promising when they are given to a mouse with a human-like disease, but then that same molecule does nothing (or worse, is toxic!) when it goes into human clin...
Post a Comment
Read more