Skip to main content

The flying purple-people-eater, and other compound words



What’s wrong with the following sentence: I saw a one-eyed, one-horned, flying purple-babies-eater? It sounds off doesn’t it? If you have heard the song I am referencing I’m sure you would quickly correct me—it’s a purple-people-eater not a purple-babies-eater. But even if you hadn’t heard the song you would probably say, don’t you mean a flying purple-baby-eater?

The error our ears hear in the sentence is built into the way we use language. Steven Pinker explains this word quirk in his book The Language Instinct with a theory of word structure and mental storage. He notes that the noun in a compound word, such as people in purple-people-eater, must be a stem. A stem is the simplest unit of a word that can be manipulated into different parts of speech when certain rules are applied to it. Book would be the stem of books, table the stem of tables, and owl the stem of owls. What do these stems have in common? They are all regular nouns in the sense that forming each of their plurals follows a simple rule—add an s. 

We all know about irregular nouns then. The plural forms of irregular nouns can’t be predicted by a rule like add an s. Here are just a few examples: calf-calves, foot-feet, and child-children. Just like when you were learning irregular verb conjugations in Spanish class, these irregular English plural forms must simply be memorized. Since by definition there is no rule for how to form irregular plurals, both foot and feet must be stored in our memories separately as two different concepts! The same is true for calf and calves, and goose and geese.
 
Steven Pinker would say that all four of these words, calf, calves, goose, geese, are stored in our mental rolodex as stems. Since compound words are only formed from stem words, plural forms of irregular nouns are available for compounding while plural forms of regular verbs are not. This explains why purple-people-eater sounds okay, but purple-babies-eater definitely does not. 

Whether or not word stems actually exist and are stored as little chunks of communicative units, this rule of compounding is quite fascinating. It leaves me asking questions like “Why do we have irregular plural nouns at all?” and “Why do we intuitively know that babies-eater is wrong while baby-eater is right?” Although Pinker’s word structure/storage theory doesn’t answer these questions, it is a nifty way to conceptualize one of the many quirks of the English language.

Check out the suggested further reading for an intriguing psychological study of compound word forming in children and to find more examples of irregular plural compounds. Or better yet, think of some for yourself and post them in the comments below!

Sources and further reading
Pinker, S. (1994) The Language Instinct. Camberwell, VIC, Australia: Penguin Group.
 
Berent, I. & Pinker, S. (2007). The dislike of regular plurals in compounds: Phonological familiarity or morphological constraint? The Mental Lexicon 2(2), pp 129-181: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Precision murder -- wait, no -- medicine

A non-zero amount of what we call ‘medicine’ could be described as just controlled cell murder.  This was my revelation after researching a new treatment for certain cardiac arrhythmias called Pulsed Electric Field Ablation, which I became interested in when my father-in-law asked me how it worked during our Christmas visit. “How can it kill the heart cells and leave the nerves and blood vessels intact?” I had no idea. I know next-to-nothing about medical treatments for cardiac patients, much less how this Pulsed Field Ablation technique could have fewer side effects than the standard-of-care ablation techniques. A quick Google search piqued my curiosity when I learned that PFA is also sometimes called “high frequency irreversible electroporation”. While less catchy, that name revealed a bit more about the mechanism of action behind PFA - electroporation - which happens to be something I actually do know something about. Electroporation refers to the formation of holes (pores) in c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Winter is here

Frigid temperatures in Arkansas this weekend have inspired an icy topic.   If you’ve ever wondered why your lettuce wilts when it accidentally freezes in the refrigerator, or your basil dies after the first frost then this post is for you.  Contrary to what I believed and maybe what some of you do to, plant cells themselves rarely freeze. The water in between cells freezes much more readily than the cells themselves; this is the start of the plant’s problems.  Dehydration is the most common culprit for cell death at cold temperatures. It seems counter intuitive that dehydration would occur as a result of freezing water , but it makes sense when you begin to think like a plant cell. All living cells exist in a state of equilibrium with their surroundings. Ions, gases, small molecules and water are constantly moving around the plant, going in and out of cells as needed. The concentrations of these species inside and outside of the cell are carefully regulated b...
4 comments
Read more

Life in TECHnicolor

If you’re near a window take a quick look out of it. If you’re in your bedroom, glance at your closet. If you’re in the kitchen, open up the fridge. Just take a minute to appreciate the life and vibrancy that color adds to our world. Now imagine that you can’t see any of it; an orange is just slightly darker grey than a banana and the leaves of a tree are the same dusty grey as the flowers that bloom on its branches. This is how Neil Harbisson experiences our brilliant world of color – in grayscale. Neil has complete achromatopsia, or total color blindness. Although this is tragic news, it is not the end of the story.  When he was 21 Neil became a part of a project along with Adam Montandon (an expert in Digital Futures according to his website) that would allow Neil to experience color for the first time. You might think the solution would involve some sort of operation or eye transplant, but their idea was much more innovative. They developed the Eyeborg—a sort of third ...
2 comments
Read more