Skip to main content

The flying purple-people-eater, and other compound words



What’s wrong with the following sentence: I saw a one-eyed, one-horned, flying purple-babies-eater? It sounds off doesn’t it? If you have heard the song I am referencing I’m sure you would quickly correct me—it’s a purple-people-eater not a purple-babies-eater. But even if you hadn’t heard the song you would probably say, don’t you mean a flying purple-baby-eater?

The error our ears hear in the sentence is built into the way we use language. Steven Pinker explains this word quirk in his book The Language Instinct with a theory of word structure and mental storage. He notes that the noun in a compound word, such as people in purple-people-eater, must be a stem. A stem is the simplest unit of a word that can be manipulated into different parts of speech when certain rules are applied to it. Book would be the stem of books, table the stem of tables, and owl the stem of owls. What do these stems have in common? They are all regular nouns in the sense that forming each of their plurals follows a simple rule—add an s

We all know about irregular nouns then. The plural forms of irregular nouns can’t be predicted by a rule like add an s. Here are just a few examples: calf-calves, foot-feet, and child-children. Just like when you were learning irregular verb conjugations in Spanish class, these irregular English plural forms must simply be memorized. Since by definition there is no rule for how to form irregular plurals, both foot and feet must be stored in our memories separately as two different concepts! The same is true for calf and calves, and goose and geese.
 
Steven Pinker would say that all four of these words, calf, calves, goose, geese, are stored in our mental rolodex as stems. Since compound words are only formed from stem words, plural forms of irregular nouns are available for compounding while plural forms of regular verbs are not. This explains why purple-people-eater sounds okay, but purple-babies-eater definitely does not. 

Whether or not word stems actually exist and are stored as little chunks of communicative units, this rule of compounding is quite fascinating. It leaves me asking questions like “Why do we have irregular plural nouns at all?” and “Why do we intuitively know that babies-eater is wrong while baby-eater is right?” Although Pinker’s word structure/storage theory doesn’t answer these questions, it is a nifty way to conceptualize one of the many quirks of the English language.

Check out the suggested further reading for an intriguing psychological study of compound word forming in children and to find more examples of irregular plural compounds. Or better yet, think of some for yourself and post them in the comments below!

Sources and further reading
Pinker, S. (1994) The Language Instinct. Camberwell, VIC, Australia: Penguin Group.
 
Berent, I. & Pinker, S. (2007). The dislike of regular plurals in compounds: Phonological familiarity or morphological constraint? The Mental Lexicon 2(2), pp 129-181: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chemically combating chemical combat

As we have witnessed all too recently, chemical warfare is a very tangible concern for many people of the world. The latest large scale attack occurred in Syria only a few months ago with the use of Sarin gas. The news from Syria makes it all the more urgent that scientists find ways to combat the use of chemical weapons. A group of engineers at UC San Diego have done just that using a new kind of structure called “micromachines”. Many chemical weapon agents used in warfare belong to a class of chemicals broadly labeled “organophosphates”. This label is given to molecules that have a generically organic part and a phosphate part. Here is the molecule sarin, with its organic and phosphate parts highlighted: Nerve gasses like sarin are dangerous because of the way the molecules interact with our nervous system. This interaction is highly dependent on the shape, or conformation of the molecule. That is, if we could somehow break up the atoms in the sarin molecule, they w

Winter is here

Frigid temperatures in Arkansas this weekend have inspired an icy topic.   If you’ve ever wondered why your lettuce wilts when it accidentally freezes in the refrigerator, or your basil dies after the first frost then this post is for you.  Contrary to what I believed and maybe what some of you do to, plant cells themselves rarely freeze. The water in between cells freezes much more readily than the cells themselves; this is the start of the plant’s problems.  Dehydration is the most common culprit for cell death at cold temperatures. It seems counter intuitive that dehydration would occur as a result of freezing water , but it makes sense when you begin to think like a plant cell. All living cells exist in a state of equilibrium with their surroundings. Ions, gases, small molecules and water are constantly moving around the plant, going in and out of cells as needed. The concentrations of these species inside and outside of the cell are carefully regulated by the plant. S

Thrills and Chills -- and Dopaminergic Spills?

Scenario: You’re listening to one of your favorite pieces.   Suddenly some cue in the music makes your heart feel like it might beat out of your chest and your skin start to tingle. Within seconds your arm hairs are standing straight up, a wave of chills runs down your spine and you are covered in goose bumps. The first time this happened to me I think I was about 12 singing along to a hymn from the pew of my church. I thought for sure what I was feeling was the Holy Spirit coursing through my veins! Not to write off any divine experience my 12-year old self was having, but it turns out that there were some other things going on – mostly in my brain. It’s been known for a while now that lots of human behavior is reinforced by activity in our brains that makes us feel good. For the most part these feelings of pleasure are meant to encourage us to keep doing things that tend to help our species survive, i.e. having sex or eating delicious food (although highly addictive dr